Shouldn't these be in chronological order, with 2010 at the bottom of the page?--Salnax 18:47, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I was thinking the exact opposite-the newest at the top. Makes more sense imho to have the newest at the top of the page.--Fire 23:47, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Mho is the opposite, but whatever. You started the article, you get to pick the format.--Salnax 03:47, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Great article, guys! I was thrown for a moment seeing the chonology done that way, however it is done that way for a number of other chonological articles in wikis - it could be argued that what people are usually most interested in is the more recent stuff. Besides, as Salnax says, if all other reasons fail us, the originator who bothered to start the article gets to decide!
Icedragon64 09:54, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Article Name Change
This is not really a list, it is an article about April Fools Day on Newgrounds. It has an intro paragraph which we will want to build on into something substantial and each item on the list already has a substantial chunk of info, which will be built on - eg peoples submissions and maybe a few classic posts. If you were thinking of it as an article, it would look just like this. I suggest April Fools Day (on Newgrounds isn't really neccesary, as this wiki is about Newgrounds anyway.
Icedragon64 21:42, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
I concur.--Salnax 22:20, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Spaintendo 08:40, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Sure. Keep this page as a redirect though.--Fire 01:23, April 13, 2010 (UTC)