No edit summary |
(→pic?) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[User:Icedragon64|Icedragon64]] 23:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC) |
[[User:Icedragon64|Icedragon64]] 23:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | Wasn't AntiTanner a former mod as well? |
+ | Wasn't AntiTanner a former mod as well?[[User:Cga-999|Cga-999]] ([[User talk:Cga-999|talk]]) 06:59, December 6, 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:59, 6 December 2014
Bigbadron[]
I am inclined to think that BBR is one ex who may deserve a page if we look into him enough. certainly there should be plenty of information in his 20K posts which is quite Notable and from what little I know of the BBS, his name always comes up when talking of notorious mods. Its the BBS, what do I know?
Icedragon64 00:08, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
To be honest...[]
I wish we had gone down this path with Moderators. I wish I had stuck to my guns when I wrote that they were not automatically worth a page. The dilemma is that they are very important on NG and the effort and responsibility of moderating obviously seems to make them Notable- however, Notability is only ONE of the criteria for what makes a worthy page on wikiG. Info on subject is another. Let that be a lesson to us. We should have more lists like this on subjects where something seems to be worthy in some sense, but not in another.
Icedragon64 09:58, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
pic?[]
What can we have?
Icedragon64 23:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Wasn't AntiTanner a former mod as well?Cga-999 (talk) 06:59, December 6, 2014 (UTC)